Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

94539

in Fremont, CaliforniaPopulation 52,396

76.67/ 100

Ranked #5 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.02%)

Ranked #2 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 0.2%)

Ranked #1 of 174 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA ZIPs (top 0.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$243,552

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

14.3%

in the bottom 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

2.7%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

7.0%

in the bottom 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.7%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.1%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

3.7%

in the bottom 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

4.0%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 94539, one of several in Fremont, California comes out in the top 0.02% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5th) and the top 0.2% of California (2nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: household income sits in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled obesity settles in the bottom 0.03% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 0.10% nationally, housing insecurity lands in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and transportation is in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled independent living disability resides in the bottom 0.08% nationally. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and disaster risk lies in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 2.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 95014, about 9.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.8%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.5 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $243,552 predicts 83.6 years — 1.9 years above.

    Ranked #1,010 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.5 ± 1.7 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 82.2 years — 3.2 years above them.

    Ranked #674 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 14.4; chronic-disease standing 98.3 (top 10%) — 84 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,487 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.9%14.0–18.1
High blood pressure among adults25.8%23.0–28.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.2%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Coronary heart disease among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Depression among adults13.1%11.3–15.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.0–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.6–39.7
Obesity among adults14.3%11.7–17.3
Stroke among adults2.1%1.9–2.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.2%3.4–5.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.0%2.6–3.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.3%69.9–76.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.5%72.5–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.6–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.9%54.5–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.3%70.7–75.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%71.2–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.9–13.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.2%13.8–18.9
Short sleep duration among adults32.1%28.4–36.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
Frequent mental distress among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Frequent physical distress among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Any disability among adults18.4%16.1–20.9
Hearing disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Independent living disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Mobility disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.6
Self-care disability among adults1.7%1.5–1.9
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%24.0–30.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–8.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Loneliness among adults35.4%31.2–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults2.7%2.3–3.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)79.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription97.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate79.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population56.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households46.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$243,552$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$1,950,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$3,214$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.5 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 85.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured