Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92703

in Santa Ana, CaliforniaPopulation 62,447

44.88/ 100

Ranked #22,536 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #1,322 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #327 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (bottom 11.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

46.6%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

30.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

22.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

27.8%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.4%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.4%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.1%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

25%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 92703, one of several in Santa Ana, California places in the bottom 30% nationally (22,536th) and the bottom 23% of California (1,322nd).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 0.7% nationally, and uninsured rests in the top 3.3% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health lands in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled loneliness stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the top 4.1% nationally. More encouragingly, walkability settles in the top 3.6% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 92704, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $84,437 predicts 79.4 years — 1.2 years above.

    Ranked #1,406 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 2.2 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 90.7 (top 10%) — 89 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,787 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.5 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #1,534 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.7%14.0–17.5
High blood pressure among adults28.0%25.5–30.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Current asthma among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Depression among adults18.5%16.2–20.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.5–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%32.0–37.7
Obesity among adults29.0%25.2–33.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.2%14.3–20.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years22.2%19.8–24.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.9%64.9–70.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.9%64.7–71.1
Cholesterol screening among adults80.5%78.6–82.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years46.6%42.3–50.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.6%45.5–51.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%66.7–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.9–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.9%32.3–39.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.6%35.7–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.4%29.6–35.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%17.1–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.4–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.4–21.3
Any disability among adults36.1%32.8–39.4
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Vision disability among adults8.8%8.1–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.1%31.5–38.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.3%29.2–35.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.0%23.3–28.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.0%22.3–27.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.7%13.2–16.3
Loneliness among adults40.1%36.2–43.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6420.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)39.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate51.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)30.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population46.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households38.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+12.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age34.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$84,437$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$618,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$2,008$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured