ZIP code

92587

in Quail Valley, CaliforniaPopulation 18,218

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

52.12/ 100

Ranked #13,296 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #937 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #60 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st

US1st

Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

42.8%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st

US93rd

Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Quail Valley, California (ZIP 92587) ranks in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,296th) and the bottom 45% of California (937th).

Several of the strongest readings define how this area looks: fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 17% nationally, and modeled mammography rests in the top 15% nationally. Walkability lands in the top 20% nationally, and modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 19% nationally. Modeled radon rests in the bottom 26% nationally, and home broadband subscription lands in the top 22% nationally. On the other hand, modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum, housing-cost burden rests in the top 7.2% nationally, and modeled extreme heat lands in the top 10.8% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 18% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 92532, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesCaliforniaMetro area

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of California

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

About typical

close to the middle of California

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Disability

healthier than 46%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of California

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of this metro area

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Disability

healthier than 63%

About typical

close to the middle of this metro area

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of this metro area

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	26.9%	24.6–29.3
High blood pressure among adults	34.2%	31.5–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	7.9%	7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults	10.3%	9.2–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults	6.3%	5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	6.2%	5.5–7.0
Depression among adults	24.8%	22.1–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	11.4%	10.1–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	37.7%	34.8–40.7
Obesity among adults	36.5%	32.5–40.7
Stroke among adults	3.3%	3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	9.1%	7.4–11.2

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	9.2%	7.9–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	71.5%	68.7–74.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	72.8%	69.9–75.7
Cholesterol screening among adults	86.0%	84.4–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	62.4%	58.0–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	63.3%	60.3–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	79.3%	73.7–84.3

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	15.3%	13.2–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults	12.5%	10.8–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	24.3%	21.4–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults	37.6%	33.5–41.8

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	22.3%	20.0–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults	18.1%	16.3–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults	14.9%	13.3–16.6

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	15.8%	14.1–17.6
Any disability among adults	34.1%	30.9–37.5
Hearing disability among adults	6.7%	6.0–7.5
Independent living disability among adults	9.0%	8.1–10.0
Mobility disability among adults	15.7%	14.0–17.5
Self-care disability among adults	4.1%	3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults	5.4%	4.9–5.9

Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults	25.4%	22.4–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	16.5%	14.2–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults	14.9%	12.8–16.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	14.5%	12.7–16.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults	8.9%	7.9–10.0
Loneliness among adults	35.2%	31.6–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults	7.6%	6.6–8.7

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	13.4%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–64	8.4%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)	10.9%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	26.6%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)	4.7%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle	3.8%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription	94.6%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	42.8%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate	81.6%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	3.0%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population	9.3%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households	50.8%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+	19.7%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age	39.2 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income	$104,290	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value	$632,900	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent	$2,233	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth	81.7 yr ± 1.09	78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308	80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

05401Vermont95% similar
Score 56.93View 05401 Compare this ZIP with 05401
27858North Carolina95% similar
Score 54.53View 27858 Compare this ZIP with 27858
98247Washington94% similar
Score 54.64View 98247 Compare this ZIP with 98247
98276Washington93% similar
Score 54.09View 98276 Compare this ZIP with 98276
28403North Carolina92% similar
Score 55.65View 28403 Compare this ZIP with 28403
29424South Carolina92% similar
Score 55.16View 29424 Compare this ZIP with 29424
65215Missouri92% similar
Score 56.29View 65215 Compare this ZIP with 65215
97333Oregon92% similar
Score 54.19View 97333 Compare this ZIP with 97333
98225Washington91% similar
Score 54.66View 98225 Compare this ZIP with 98225
95564California91% similar
Score 51.28View 95564 Compare this ZIP with 95564

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured