ZIP code
29424
in Charleston, South CarolinaPopulation 1,243
55.16/ 100
Ranked #9,264 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)
Ranked #73 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 18%)
Ranked #20 of 45 Charleston-North Charleston, SC ZIPs (top 44%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
13.6%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
29.1%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
9.6%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
1.6%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
0.90%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.50%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
3.3%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Outer-floodplain exposure
81.9%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, ZIP 29424, one of several in Charleston, South Carolina sits in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,264th) and the top 18% of South Carolina (73rd).
The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally, high blood pressure stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and diabetes is in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 0.4% nationally, stroke sits in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking lands in the top 0.2% nationally, and slow internet speeds resides at the national maximum. Homeownership lies at the national minimum, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 0.5% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 29401, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston-North Charleston, SC metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.5%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 78%
11%
Disability
healthier than 84%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 79%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 54%
16%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.9%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 25%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 68%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 80%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 40%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 24%
14%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 1.0%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 1.0%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 77%
11%
Disability
healthier than 75%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 86%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 73%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 43%
16%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 18%
14%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.00%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 35.8; chronic-disease standing 99.5 (top 1%) — 64 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #15,768 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
29401
South Carolinashares a border
Score 61.78
Closest healthier
29403
South Carolinashares a border
Score 55.37
Similar health profile
71998
Arkansas98% similar profile
Score 55.16
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 4.8% | 3.9–5.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 9.6% | 8.0–11.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 1.0% | 0.9–1.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.0% | 8.6–11.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 0.9% | 0.7–1.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 2.1% | 1.5–2.9 |
| Depression among adults | 31.0% | 26.6–35.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 1.6% | 1.3–1.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 13.6% | 11.7–15.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 21.1% | 17.1–25.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.5% | 0.4–0.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 16.5% | 13.0–20.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.9% | 7.9–16.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 23.6% | 20.3–27.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 68.8% | 64.5–72.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 65.1% | 58.7–70.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 57.9% | 53.4–62.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 59.4% | 55.9–62.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.7% | 64.7–78.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 29.1% | 25.3–32.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 6.4% | 3.9–9.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 16.0% | 11.6–20.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.9% | 26.1–33.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 12.6% | 9.2–17.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 24.8% | 19.8–29.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 8.2% | 6.2–10.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 22.4% | 16.8–27.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.6% | 22.2–34.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 2.4% | 1.9–2.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 7.2–13.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 3.3% | 2.4–4.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.4% | 1.0–1.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.1–5.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.2% | 18.0–27.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.3% | 12.2–26.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 5.6–13.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 8.0–14.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.9% | 9.5–16.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 42.3% | 37.1–47.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 5.2–9.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 100.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 20.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410 |
| Foreign-born population | 6.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419 |
| Median age | 19.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $950 ($678–$1,545) n=343 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured