Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92551

in Moreno Valley, CaliforniaPopulation 37,425

48.68/ 100

Ranked #18,101 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #1,161 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #85 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

15.0%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST19th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.1%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

24.6%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

395 units

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.7 mi

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

28.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 92551, one of several in Moreno Valley, California, overall, ranks in the bottom 44% nationally (18,101st) and the bottom 32% of California (1,161st).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: crowded housing sits in the top 2.2% nationally, modeled disaster risk lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled loneliness stands in the top 4.0% nationally, housing insecurity rests in the top 4.4% nationally, and tree cover registers at the national minimum. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled food insecurity is in the top 7.5% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 6.0% nationally.

Defined simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 92555, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.4 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $99,970 predicts 80.1 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,692 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.9%18.0–21.8
High blood pressure among adults30.8%28.3–33.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Depression among adults21.7%19.1–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%11.0–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%30.4–35.9
Obesity among adults39.9%35.7–44.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.0–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.4%14.3–18.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.2%63.3–69.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.4%66.2–72.5
Cholesterol screening among adults81.9%79.9–83.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.0%49.6–58.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.9%52.6–59.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%73.1–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.6–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%27.4–34.0
Short sleep duration among adults41.9%37.7–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%24.9–30.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.3–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.6–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.7–20.6
Any disability among adults36.1%32.9–39.4
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Independent living disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Mobility disability among adults15.7%14.2–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.8–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.9%28.7–35.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.3%25.5–31.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.8%21.3–26.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.6%22.2–27.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.5–15.6
Loneliness among adults40.1%36.5–44.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.7–13.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6414.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)22.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate70.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)15.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population24.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households36.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+8.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age30.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$99,970$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$474,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$2,137$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured