Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92392

in Victorville, CaliforniaPopulation 65,429

46.92/ 100

Ranked #20,261 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #1,233 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #90 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

52.5%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.1%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.0%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

316 units

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.2%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 92392, one of several in Victorville, California ranks in the bottom 37% nationally (20,261st) and the bottom 28% of California (1,233rd).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, and lead in tap water is at the national minimum. Subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 7.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled colon screening resides in the bottom 3.1% nationally, loneliness registers in the top 4.0% nationally, and tree cover rests at the national minimum. Crowded housing stands in the top 4.9% nationally, unemployment lies in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity lands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled food insecurity sits in the top 8.5% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Close by, ZIP 92344, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.6 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $87,681 predicts 79.6 years — 2.9 years below.

    Ranked #4,036 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%19.6–23.9
High blood pressure among adults32.5%29.6–35.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.5–5.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Depression among adults20.7%18.1–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%30.2–36.1
Obesity among adults35.5%31.1–39.9
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.3%11.8–17.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.6%13.7–17.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.9%64.8–70.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.1%65.7–72.2
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%80.3–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years52.5%48.1–57.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%48.7–55.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%65.7–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.3–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%12.3–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.3%25.0–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults40.0%35.7–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.1%25.6–30.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.5–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.9–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.7–20.3
Any disability among adults33.9%30.7–37.1
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.8–17.0
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.5
Vision disability among adults7.6%7.0–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.2%28.8–35.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.2%24.4–30.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.4%22.9–28.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%19.6–24.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.3–15.2
Loneliness among adults40.1%36.3–44.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)18.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)13.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate71.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population18.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households37.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+11.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age32.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$87,681$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$410,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,810$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 0.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.46 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured