Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92341

in Green Valley Lake, CaliforniaPopulation 406

47.31/ 100

Ranked #19,786 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #1,219 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #88 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

91%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

3.7 days/year

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

17%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.08%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.7 ppb

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US92nd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.45%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.2%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Green Valley Lake, California (ZIP 92341), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 38% nationally (19,786th) and the bottom 29% of California (1,219th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: unemployment rests in the top 2.9% nationally, lead in tap water sits in the top 8.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 9.7% nationally. Better still, park land lands in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and poverty lies at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription settles at the national maximum. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure rests in the bottom 9.5% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 92382, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.9%32.5–39.3
High blood pressure among adults44.5%40.6–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.1–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%8.6–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.1%8.8–13.4
Depression among adults23.9%20.8–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.7%13.4–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%39.0–46.1
Obesity among adults36.2%31.4–41.0
Stroke among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.1–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.5–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.1–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.8%72.6–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.9–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%62.4–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.5%59.4–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%66.3–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.6–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%13.7–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%21.5–30.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%31.0–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.9%23.7–32.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%15.7–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%15.5–20.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%13.8–18.8
Any disability among adults36.4%31.6–41.2
Hearing disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Independent living disability among adults11.3%9.4–13.2
Mobility disability among adults20.5%17.1–24.0
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.1–7.4
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.0–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.1%20.7–27.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.1%14.5–22.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.2%17.6–27.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.6–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.2–11.5
Loneliness among adults32.8%28.9–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)17.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate76.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population17.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households49.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$97,273$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$366,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 2.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.24 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured