Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92140

in San Diego, CaliforniaPopulation 2,038

59.55/ 100

Ranked #5,183 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #533 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #55 of 106 San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

12.4%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

28.8%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

9.6%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

32.8%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

1.5%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

0.90%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.50%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

17.5%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

48.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 92140, one of several in San Diego, California ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,183rd) and the top 31% of California (533rd).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and high blood pressure resides in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and obesity rests in the bottom 0.4% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking is in the top 0.2% nationally, transportation noise stands at the national maximum, and loud transportation noise settles in the top 0.03% nationally. Modeled loneliness lies in the top 0.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 92101, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.05%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.2%

21%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 4.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 100.0 (top 1%) — 95 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #18,122 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults2.6%2.2–3.0
High blood pressure among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.7%0.6–0.8
Current asthma among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Coronary heart disease among adults0.9%0.8–1.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.3%1.1–1.6
Depression among adults20.4%17.9–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults1.5%1.3–1.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened12.4%10.9–14.0
Obesity among adults17.5%15.0–20.4
Stroke among adults0.5%0.4–0.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.3–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%8.9–17.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure12.3%10.6–14.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults54.8%50.7–59.1
Cholesterol screening among adults58.0%52.5–64.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.3%50.3–58.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.8%51.4–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.4%74.8–85.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults28.8%25.2–32.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.2%4.7–7.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.8%11.4–18.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%30.7–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.2%11.6–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults22.1%19.7–24.6
Frequent physical distress among adults7.3%6.3–8.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.1%18.0–25.2
Any disability among adults27.2%23.2–32.1
Hearing disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.9
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.0–8.8
Mobility disability among adults2.5%2.1–3.2
Self-care disability among adults1.1%1.0–1.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.1–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults36.9%32.2–41.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%12.9–22.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%7.6–13.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.4–15.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.2–15.1
Loneliness among adults48.7%44.2–53.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.2–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population5.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age20.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured