ZIP code
92135
in Coronado, CaliforniaPopulation 849
62.23/ 100
Ranked #3,382 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.6%)
Ranked #397 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 23%)
Ranked #42 of 106 San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA ZIPs (top 40%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
12.3%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
36.4%
in the bottom 0.07% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
27.4%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
9.7%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
1.4%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
0.80%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.50%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Obesity
18%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
2.4%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
48.2%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, ZIP 92135, one of several in Coronado, California lands in the top 10.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,382nd) and the top 23% of California (397th).
The measures split the difference for this area: modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the bottom 0.3% nationally, obesity lies in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Against that, modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 0.07% nationally, binge drinking registers in the top 0.2% nationally, and loneliness sits in the top 0.3% nationally.
Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 92118, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.05%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 72%
11%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.6%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 64%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 51%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 47%
14%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 13%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.2%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 72%
14%
Disability
healthier than 96%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.6%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 51%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 48%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 41%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 7%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 6%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.00%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 29%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 4%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 32%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 1%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92118
Californiashares a border
Score 66.23
Closest healthier
92155
Californiaabout 0.1 mi away
Score 69.64
Similar health profile
92055
California100% similar profile
Score 60.59
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 3.1% | 2.7–3.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 9.7% | 8.4–11.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 0.8% | 0.7–0.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.4% | 7.4–9.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 0.8% | 0.7–0.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 1.2% | 1.0–1.5 |
| Depression among adults | 22.6% | 19.9–25.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 1.4% | 1.2–1.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 12.3% | 10.8–14.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 18.0% | 15.4–21.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.5% | 0.4–0.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 3.8% | 2.8–5.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.0% | 5.7–10.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 15.5% | 13.3–18.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 59.0% | 54.8–63.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 65.6% | 60.6–71.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 36.4% | 32.4–40.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 60.0% | 56.9–63.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.8% | 63.4–77.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 27.4% | 24.0–31.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 5.8% | 4.3–7.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 12.6% | 9.9–15.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.0% | 31.5–38.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 11.7% | 9.3–13.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.4% | 19.0–25.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 6.6% | 5.5–7.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.9% | 15.2–22.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 23.6% | 19.3–27.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 2.0% | 1.6–2.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.7% | 5.4–7.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 2.4% | 1.9–2.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.0% | 0.9–1.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.0% | 2.5–3.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 34.6% | 29.4–39.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.4% | 11.0–17.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.8% | 7.3–12.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 9.9–14.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.7% | 8.6–12.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 48.2% | 43.5–52.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 4.1–6.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 10.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 4.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 21.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured