ZIP code
91387
in Canyon Country, CaliforniaPopulation 46,869
57.90/ 100
Ranked #6,483 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)
Ranked #620 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 36%)
Ranked #190 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (bottom 49%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Park land
63.2%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
4.2%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
40.4%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
9.3%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Obesity
26%
in the bottom 7.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST32ndUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST76thUS95thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.3%
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
43.8%
in the top 6.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
27.2%
in the bottom 4.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.8%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 91387, one of several in Canyon Country, California ranks in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,483rd) and the top 36% of California (620th).
Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: park land lies in the top 1.5% nationally, and modeled obesity resides in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Against that, modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 1.9% nationally, modeled loneliness is in the top 3.5% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 5.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the top 6.4% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 91390, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 95%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 70%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 64%
8%
Disability
healthier than 73%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 47%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 16%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 38%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 85%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 68%
14%
Disability
healthier than 68%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 47%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 46%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 59%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 47%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 32%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 74%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 88%
14%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 43%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 42%
11%
Disability
healthier than 56%
7%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 33%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 7%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 41.7; chronic-disease standing 94.8 (top 10%) — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #14,700 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
91042
Californiashares a border
Score 54.04
Closest healthier
91390
Californiashares a border
Score 62.35
Similar health profile
95020
California97% similar profile
Score 58.55
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 18.7% | 17.2–20.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 27.2% | 25.3–29.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.8% | 5.3–6.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.3% | 3.9–4.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.4% | 3.9–4.8 |
| Depression among adults | 20.7% | 18.7–22.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.1% | 9.1–11.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.9% | 32.7–37.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 26.0% | 23.3–28.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.6% | 2.4–2.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 7.0% | 5.7–8.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.6% | 8.4–10.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 68.8% | 66.2–71.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 71.0% | 68.6–73.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.1% | 83.7–86.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 57.1% | 53.7–60.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.6% | 62.1–66.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.7% | 70.6–80.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.9% | 15.1–18.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 10.9% | 9.7–12.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.3% | 20.2–24.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.9% | 33.0–38.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 20.5% | 18.8–22.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.9% | 15.5–18.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.0% | 11.9–14.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.9% | 13.6–16.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.4% | 26.3–30.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.8% | 4.3–5.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.7% | 7.0–8.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.9% | 10.9–13.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.6% | 3.3–3.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.0% | 4.6–5.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 30.2% | 27.8–32.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.2% | 15.5–19.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.9% | 13.3–16.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.5% | 14.0–17.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 8.1–10.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 40.4% | 37.8–43.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.9% | 6.1–7.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 9.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 9.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 11.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 32.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 96.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 43.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 64.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 9.3% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 23.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 37.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 11.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 35.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $117,969 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $756,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $2,534 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured