Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20111

in Manassas, VirginiaPopulation 38,124

56.48/ 100

Ranked #7,787 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #227 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #234 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

61.6%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.4%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

60.9%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US76th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 20111, one of several in Manassas, Virginia ranks in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,787th) and the top 26% of Virginia (227th).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Lead in tap water stands in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally, modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and household income is in the top 11.8% nationally. By contrast, modeled pfas settles in the top 7.4% nationally, crowded housing resides in the top 7.8% nationally, and modeled uninsured registers in the top 9.8% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Close by, ZIP 20109, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.6 ± 1.4 years. The 37 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.7 years — 2.1 years below them.

    Ranked #1,608 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.5%18.7–22.5
High blood pressure among adults30.6%28.1–33.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%9.0–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Depression among adults21.1%18.9–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.4–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.6–38.3
Obesity among adults35.6%30.9–40.7
Stroke among adults2.6%2.5–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%11.2–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.7%13.9–17.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.0%69.7–74.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.1%73.5–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%83.2–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%57.3–64.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%61.0–66.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%70.1–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.5–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%11.4–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%24.1–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%33.9–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%18.3–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%15.0–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.8–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%14.2–17.1
Any disability among adults30.8%28.0–33.9
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Independent living disability among adults7.7%7.1–8.4
Mobility disability among adults12.5%11.3–13.8
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Vision disability among adults5.4%5.0–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%21.5–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.1%16.1–20.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%11.1–14.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%13.3–16.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Loneliness among adults35.7%31.9–39.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.4–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6422.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)19.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate67.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population33.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households41.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+10.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age35.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$113,879$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$476,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,066$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured