Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

89705

in Carson City, NevadaPopulation 4,935

56.12/ 100

Ranked #8,142 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #34 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

7.7%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Park land

46.1%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

33.4%

in the bottom 31% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US31st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

33.9%

in the top 33% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US67th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 89705, one of several in Carson City, Nevada ranks in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,142nd) and the top 20% of Nevada (34th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: park land rests in the top 2.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Physicians stands in the top 7.9% nationally, and modeled obesity settles in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Modeled energy burden lies in the bottom 11.4% nationally, modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 13.6% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 14.3% nationally. Against that, modeled fine-particle registers in the top 0.4% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 11.9% nationally, and modeled arsenic rests in the top 15.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 89411, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%26.6–33.8
High blood pressure among adults34.5%30.3–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.3–8.6
Depression among adults19.8%16.6–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.8–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%35.4–44.4
Obesity among adults27.9%21.8–34.8
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.4–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.6–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%72.6–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%71.5–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.7–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.1%64.1–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.1%62.4–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%64.9–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.4–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.6–15.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.5%17.8–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%27.8–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.7–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.1–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.8–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.0–15.8
Any disability among adults32.4%28.2–37.1
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Mobility disability among adults15.0%12.8–17.3
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.2–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.0–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.7–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.7–12.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.2–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161
No HS diploma (25+)9.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166
Broadband subscription93.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166
Homeownership rate80.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166
Foreign-born population11.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168
Single-parent households67.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162
Population 65+32.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168
Median age53.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165
Median household income$79,901$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147
Median home value$470,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147
Median gross rent$1,441$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.4–82.3) n=151

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.50 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured