Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83333

in Hailey, IdahoPopulation 12,682

64.06/ 100

Ranked #2,413 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.6%)

Ranked #5 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 1.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

1.6 days/year

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.2%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.4%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

27 mi

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Park land

46.2%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.6%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Hailey, Idaho (ZIP 83333) stands in the top 7.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,413th) and the top 1.9% of Idaho (5th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and loneliness settles in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally, park land rests in the top 2.7% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon rests in the top 2.2% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 2.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 83340, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 13.3; chronic-disease standing 87.2 — 74 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,722 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%21.9–27.9
High blood pressure among adults29.0%25.2–32.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Depression among adults19.1%16.0–22.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.0–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.8%29.6–37.6
Obesity among adults23.4%17.8–28.8
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.2–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%9.1–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.8%69.1–76.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.2–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.1–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%61.1–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.3%67.0–73.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.9%66.3–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.2–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.9%8.1–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.6%16.0–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults28.6%23.2–34.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.0–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.5%11.7–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.7–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
Any disability among adults29.3%25.2–33.2
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.3
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.3
Mobility disability among adults12.5%10.7–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.4
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%16.2–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.8–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.1–7.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.8–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults26.2%22.2–30.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6414.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription95.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate73.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population15.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households53.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$99,704$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$744,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,547$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured