Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

89439

in Verdi, NevadaPopulation 2,532

54.25/ 100

Ranked #10,370 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #41 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #10 of 32 Reno, NV ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

6.3%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

42.1%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Park land

12.9%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.7 pCi/L

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

70%

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

7.5%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

7.4%

in the bottom 33% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US33rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Verdi, Nevada (ZIP 89439) sits in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,370th) and the top 25% of Nevada (41st).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity stands in the bottom 11.4% nationally, park land is in the top 9.9% nationally, and lead in tap water rests in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled fine-particle lands in the top 0.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 1.8% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the top 7.9% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 14.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 89511, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Reno, NV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%28.0–33.9
High blood pressure among adults34.5%31.3–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.3–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.5–9.1
Depression among adults21.3%18.6–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.4–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%37.7–44.8
Obesity among adults28.0%23.9–32.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.4%12.1–17.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.1–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.1–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.9–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%86.9–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.3–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%61.2–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%69.7–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.7–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%9.9–14.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%16.6–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%32.1–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.7–22.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.5–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.1–14.7
Any disability among adults30.3%26.6–34.3
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.8
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.2–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.9–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.6–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.3–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Loneliness among adults33.5%29.9–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166
Broadband subscription83.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166
Homeownership rate77.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166
Foreign-born population4.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168
Single-parent households50.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162
Population 65+26.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165
Median household income$101,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147
Median home value$762,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 1.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.4–82.3) n=151

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.89 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured