Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

89109

in Las Vegas, NevadaPopulation 6,504

41.85/ 100

Ranked #25,338 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #119 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #52 of 72 Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

9.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.39 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

69.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

100.1 days/year

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

130 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST67th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 89109, one of several in Las Vegas, Nevada ranks in the bottom 21% nationally (25,338th) and the bottom 28% of Nevada (119th).

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: fatal road crashes is in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled extreme heat registers in the top 1.5% nationally. On the encouraging side, pharmacy lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and recreation is in the top 0.8% nationally. Outpatient registers in the top 1.1% nationally, physicians lies in the top 1.3% nationally, and transit is in the top 1.3% nationally. Mental-health providers registers in the top 1.4% nationally, civic lies in the top 1.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the top 2.4% nationally.

Against its neighbors, pharmacy runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 89118, less than a tenth of a mile away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.1–32.1
High blood pressure among adults41.7%38.1–45.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.9–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Depression among adults20.9%17.9–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.1–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%38.3–45.7
Obesity among adults34.5%29.6–39.7
Stroke among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%16.3–22.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.4%13.4–17.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%71.9–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.3–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.1–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.6%53.5–61.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.6%48.2–54.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.1%61.7–74.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.3–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%16.3–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.3%27.3–35.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.9%37.7–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.6%24.7–30.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.2–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.8–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.3–19.4
Any disability among adults39.2%35.3–43.2
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.6
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.7–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.4%18.1–22.8
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.6%24.1–31.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.4%20.7–26.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.4%20.0–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.7%16.4–21.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.3–14.3
Loneliness among adults35.3%31.2–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.7–15.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6415.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161
No HS diploma (25+)12.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168
Unemployment rate (16+)12.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161
Households without a vehicle24.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166
Homeownership rate34.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166
Foreign-born population24.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168
Single-parent households65.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168
Median age45.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165
Median household income$53,684$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147
Median home value$546,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147
Median gross rent$1,442$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured