ZIP code
89026
in Jean, NevadaPopulation 97
36.45/ 100
Ranked #28,782 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)
Ranked #148 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (bottom 10.9%)
Ranked #65 of 72 Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV ZIPs (bottom 9.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Colon-cancer screening
39.5%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
25.1%
in the bottom 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
2.2%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
47.6%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
46%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
24.2%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
3.0%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.54 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
22.9%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, ZIP 89026, one of several in Jean, Nevada stands in the bottom 10.3% nationally (28,782nd) and the bottom 10.9% of Nevada (148th).
Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and short sleep resides in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled loneliness stands in the top 0.6% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the top 1.5% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 1.2% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 1.3% nationally, coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and hearing disability resides in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure stands in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and expected annual loss sits in the bottom 2.3% nationally.
Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 89019, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 92%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 99%
14%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 1%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 3%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 40%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 34%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 94%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 48%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.7%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 5%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 38%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 23%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 79%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 41%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 4%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 7%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
89019
Nevadashares a border
Score 46.18
Closest healthier
89179
Nevadaabout 0.6 mi away
Score 58.01
Similar health profile
72427
Arkansas99% similar profile
Score 42.90
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 15.9% | 13.7–18.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 22.9% | 19.9–25.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 2.8% | 2.4–3.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 14.3% | 12.4–16.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 2.2% | 1.9–2.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.9% | 4.6–7.2 |
| Depression among adults | 32.1% | 27.8–36.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 6.2% | 5.3–7.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 25.1% | 22.2–28.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.2% | 30.0–40.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.8% | 1.6–2.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 27.3% | 22.8–32.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.7% | 10.8–19.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 52.0% | 47.6–56.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 68.9% | 64.5–73.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 77.4% | 73.0–81.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 39.5% | 35.4–43.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 44.5% | 41.0–48.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.4% | 60.4–74.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.6% | 13.0–18.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 21.8% | 16.9–26.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 29.2% | 23.7–34.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 47.6% | 43.0–52.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.1% | 18.7–27.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 30.4% | 26.4–33.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.8% | 12.4–17.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 24.2% | 19.8–28.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 34.9% | 29.1–40.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 3.0% | 2.6–3.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.7% | 10.3–15.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.2% | 9.0–13.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.0–4.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.9% | 4.9–7.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 31.6% | 26.9–36.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 30.8% | 24.8–37.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 33.4% | 25.9–41.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 27.2% | 22.3–32.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 16.6% | 13.7–20.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 46.0% | 40.8–50.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 18.1% | 15.0–21.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 51.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 31.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 71.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166 |
| Foreign-born population | 8.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 9.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168 |
| Median age | 35.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.6 yr ± 1.21 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.6 yr (75.4–82.3) n=151 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured