Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88081

in Chaparral, New MexicoPopulation 19,663

39.33/ 100

Ranked #27,183 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #259 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

29.5%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

48.6%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.7%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST27th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

28.4%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

37.8%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.7%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.2%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

19%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Chaparral, New Mexico (ZIP 88081), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 15% nationally (27,183rd) and the bottom 23% of New Mexico (259th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled uninsured stands in the top 1.2% nationally, colon screening is in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and vision disability rests in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the top 3.2% nationally, mammography registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled food insecurity resides in the top 2.5% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled self-care disability settles in the top 5.1% nationally, and utility shutoff stands in the top 3.1% nationally.

A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 79934, just across the boundary. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 3.2% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.9%19.8–24.1
High blood pressure among adults33.7%30.9–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.5–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.5
Depression among adults22.2%19.6–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.5–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%31.2–37.1
Obesity among adults41.9%37.0–47.4
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%17.9–23.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years29.5%25.9–33.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.7%67.1–72.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults65.9%62.3–69.5
Cholesterol screening among adults76.8%74.4–79.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years48.6%44.9–52.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.5%46.6–52.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.0%58.7–70.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.1–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.9–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%30.6–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.1%31.9–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.2%31.1–37.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.1–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults18.6%16.9–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.1%19.0–23.5
Any disability among adults41.0%37.3–44.9
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
Mobility disability among adults18.9%17.0–20.9
Self-care disability among adults7.2%6.6–7.8
Vision disability among adults11.7%10.7–12.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.3%25.3–31.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.8%34.3–41.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults32.1%28.7–35.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.4%25.7–31.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.0%16.3–20.0
Loneliness among adults36.8%33.1–40.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.0%17.1–21.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6427.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)31.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate69.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population30.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households43.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+12.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age32.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$46,017$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$109,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$853$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured