ZIP code
87416
in Fruitland, New MexicoPopulation 4,546
24.18/ 100
Ranked #31,551 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.7%)
Ranked #317 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 6.0%)
Ranked #11 of 16 Farmington, NM ZIPs (bottom 31%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
53.3%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
13.6%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
17.8%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
35.2%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
8.6%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
49.7%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST12thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
24.5%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
25.7%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
36.1%
in the top 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
24.3%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
Fruitland, New Mexico (ZIP 87416), overall, ranks in the bottom 1.7% nationally (31,551st) and the bottom 6.0% of New Mexico (317th).
Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled mammography settles in the bottom 0.2% nationally, vision disability is in the top 1.0% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lands in the top 1.2% nationally, self-care disability lies in the top 1.9% nationally, and colon screening stands in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 1.3% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and transportation settles in the top 0.8% nationally.
ZIP 87401, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 1.2% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Farmington, NM metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 64%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 91%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 69%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.5%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 5%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 6%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.4%
7%
Lifting this score
Healthcare Access
healthier than 79%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 51%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 29%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 17%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 8%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 8%
8%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 67%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 93%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 33%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 27%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 33%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 20%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 33%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 33%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 63.9; chronic-disease standing 7.5 (bottom 10%) — 56 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #2,001 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
87401
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 42.17
Closest healthier
87417
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 40.30
Similar health profile
87825
New Mexico99% similar profile
Score 24.95
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.8% | 27.8–33.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 38.4% | 34.8–41.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.6% | 6.0–7.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 14.7% | 13.0–16.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.2% | 9.1–11.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.6% | 11.2–14.0 |
| Depression among adults | 25.1% | 21.8–28.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.4% | 17.2–21.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 32.4% | 29.0–35.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.1% | 34.7–45.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.5% | 6.0–7.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 35.2% | 30.9–39.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.9% | 10.9–15.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 73.4% | 70.2–76.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 70.0% | 66.2–73.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 78.0% | 75.5–80.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 49.7% | 45.2–54.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 46.3% | 43.0–49.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 53.3% | 45.8–60.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.9% | 9.8–14.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 30.3% | 26.8–33.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.2% | 28.0–36.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.9% | 37.5–46.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 36.1% | 32.6–39.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 23.4% | 20.9–25.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 23.4% | 20.9–25.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 24.5% | 21.9–27.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 49.5% | 45.1–53.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 13.4% | 12.0–14.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 17.8% | 16.1–19.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 25.2% | 22.6–27.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.8–9.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 13.6% | 12.3–14.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 32.0% | 28.2–36.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 41.2% | 37.3–45.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 40.2% | 36.2–44.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 29.0% | 25.8–32.4 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 24.3% | 21.9–26.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 39.8% | 35.4–44.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 25.7% | 23.0–28.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 35.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 30.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 15.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 14.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339 |
| Households without a vehicle | 8.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347 |
| Broadband subscription | 57.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 24.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347 |
| Homeownership rate | 80.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 9.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352 |
| Single-parent households | 44.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339 |
| Population 65+ | 14.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352 |
| Median age | 37.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339 |
| Median household income | $49,973 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265 |
| Median home value | $94,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255 |
| Median gross rent | $830 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $917 ($549–$1,408) n=173 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.8 yr ± 0.80 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured