Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

87020

in Grants, New MexicoPopulation 11,966

46.82/ 100

Ranked #20,377 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #167 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

280 µg/L

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.8%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST34th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

8.5 days/year

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST30th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.3%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

27.7%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

94%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Grants, New Mexico (ZIP 87020), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 36% nationally (20,377th) and the top 50% of New Mexico (167th).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: lithium in drinking water sits in the top 0.09% nationally, distance to a Superfund site registers at the national minimum, and modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 6.5% nationally, modeled uninsured lies in the top 7.2% nationally, and poverty settles in the top 8.4% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 0.09% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 5.6% nationally.

In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 87005, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $62,746 predicts 78.2 years — 2.0 years below.

    Ranked #2,624 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.2%22.3–28.3
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.4–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Depression among adults22.9%19.5–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.9–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%29.8–37.9
Obesity among adults37.4%30.5–45.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%15.9–22.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.3%14.8–20.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.1%69.8–76.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.0%63.6–72.4
Cholesterol screening among adults81.8%79.5–84.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.8%50.6–60.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.0%51.3–58.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.6%61.5–76.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.3–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.4–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%24.5–33.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%33.2–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.3%23.5–29.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.4–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.5–19.6
Any disability among adults36.5%32.4–41.0
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Mobility disability among adults17.0%15.1–19.2
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.7–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.0%22.5–30.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.1%22.1–28.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.7%18.0–23.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.2%16.9–22.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.5–14.7
Loneliness among adults34.3%29.8–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6412.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)16.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription82.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate69.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population3.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households66.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$62,746$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$154,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$766$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured