ZIP code
86433
in Oatman, ArizonaPopulation 74
35.07/ 100
Ranked #29,364 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.5%)
Ranked #338 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 14.3%)
Ranked #21 of 24 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ ZIPs (bottom 12.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Home broadband subscription
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
14.3%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
13.1%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.7%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mammography
64.3%
in the bottom 2.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST26thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.79 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›The read
Oatman, Arizona (ZIP 86433), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 8.5% nationally (29,364th) and the bottom 14.3% of Arizona (338th).
The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: home broadband subscription stands at the national minimum, poverty is at the national maximum, and housing-cost burden rests at the national maximum. Modeled hearing disability sits in the top 0.7% nationally, coronary heart disease registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and stroke lands in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 1.9% nationally. More positively, modeled transportation noise settles at the national minimum, and homeownership stands at the national maximum.
Set against the neighboring ZIPs, home broadband subscription runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 86413, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 73%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 15%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 24%
11%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 29%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 25%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 58%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 49%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 41%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 20%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Disability
healthier than 16%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 33%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 61%
13%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 48%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 43%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 13%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 17%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 22%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 17%
8%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
86413
Arizonashares a border
Score 35.28
Closest healthier
86426
Arizonashares a border
Score 44.54
Similar health profile
38953
Mississippi99% similar profile
Score 39.06
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 38.7% | 35.2–42.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 48.1% | 44.4–51.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.7% | 12.3–15.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.8% | 10.4–13.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 13.1% | 11.4–15.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 15.6% | 12.9–18.6 |
| Depression among adults | 20.6% | 17.8–23.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 17.1% | 14.7–19.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.5% | 41.7–49.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.6% | 29.4–39.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.7% | 5.8–7.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 24.2% | 20.5–28.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.4% | 8.2–15.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.1% | 78.2–83.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 76.7% | 73.5–79.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.6% | 84.4–88.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 57.6% | 53.3–61.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.4% | 49.7–56.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 64.3% | 57.1–71.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.9% | 10.8–15.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.3% | 16.7–24.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.8% | 27.6–38.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.5% | 33.8–43.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.3% | 22.9–32.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.9% | 13.8–18.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.2% | 16.5–22.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.4% | 13.8–19.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.1% | 37.9–48.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 14.3% | 12.5–16.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.4% | 9.6–13.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.7% | 21.0–28.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.7% | 5.6–8.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.3% | 7.0–9.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.3% | 23.4–31.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.1% | 13.3–21.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 15.3% | 11.6–19.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 8.6–12.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.9% | 7.3–10.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.2% | 25.2–33.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.8% | 6.5–9.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 100.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 100.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 0.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 100.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 100.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.8 yr ± 2.31 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.31 years of 84.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured