ZIP code
85360
in Wikieup, ArizonaPopulation 130
39.72/ 100
Ranked #26,936 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)
Ranked #311 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 21%)
Ranked #15 of 24 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ ZIPs (bottom 38%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Walkability
0.49 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
12.8%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.5%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
19.8 mi
in the top 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Mammography
66.2%
in the bottom 4.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST35thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
23.3 mi
in the top 3.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST85thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
36.9%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
25.1%
in the top 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST77thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.7%
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST80thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Wikieup, Arizona (ZIP 85360) lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,936th) and the bottom 21% of Arizona (311th).
Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: walkability resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, modeled hearing disability settles in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 2.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits in the top 3.4% nationally, modeled mammography lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally, and poverty lies in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled arsenic stands in the top 4.4% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 6.0% nationally. On the better side, housing-cost burden registers at the national minimum, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 3.5% nationally.
Put simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. On the overall standing, ZIP 85325, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 34%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 24%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 16%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Disability
healthier than 14%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 37%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
Lifting this score
Mental Health
healthier than 73%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 64%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 50%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 35%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 15%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 20%
11%
Disability
healthier than 25%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 65%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 65%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 65%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 48%
11%
Disability
healthier than 48%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 30%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 39%
16%
Environmental Hazard
in the bottom 0.00%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 13%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85325
Arizonashares a border
Score 44.35
Closest healthier
85344
Arizonashares a border
Score 40.85
Similar health profile
69216
Nebraska96% similar profile
Score 41.78
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.9% | 31.5–38.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 45.5% | 41.7–49.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.4% | 11.2–13.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.7% | 9.6–12.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.5% | 10.2–12.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.5% | 10.6–14.4 |
| Depression among adults | 18.4% | 15.9–21.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.1% | 14.0–18.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.6% | 41.0–48.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.7% | 28.8–38.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.7% | 5.1–6.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 23.3% | 19.8–26.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.6% | 10.2–15.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.8% | 76.8–82.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.7% | 72.5–78.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.5% | 85.6–89.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.5% | 55.1–63.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.9% | 49.5–56.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 66.2% | 59.2–72.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.8% | 11.6–16.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.0% | 14.8–21.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 30.3% | 25.9–34.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.1% | 34.5–43.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.8% | 21.3–28.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.3% | 12.6–16.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.5% | 15.3–19.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.8% | 12.8–16.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.2% | 34.7–43.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.8% | 11.4–14.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.7% | 8.3–11.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.7% | 18.7–24.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.9% | 5.1–6.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.6–8.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.8% | 24.1–31.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.2% | 13.2–19.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.1% | 10.5–15.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.9% | 9.1–12.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 7.1–9.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.3% | 24.5–32.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.4% | 6.3–8.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 36.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 7.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 6.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 74.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 89.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 6.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 66.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 67.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | $143,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.8 yr ± 1.80 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.80 years of 84.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured