ZIP code
85352
in Tacna, ArizonaPopulation 278
30.80/ 100
Ranked #30,585 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)
Ranked #345 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 12.5%)
Too few scored ZIPs in the Yuma, AZ metro area to rank within it.
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Dry extreme heat
138.7 days/year
in the top 0.10% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
12.4%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
23.8%
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
8.4%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
50.2%
in the bottom 2.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST19thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
35.8%
in the top 2.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
30.5%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
22.3%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
13.1%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
10.6%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Tacna, Arizona (ZIP 85352) places in the bottom 4.7% nationally (30,585th) and the bottom 12.5% of Arizona (345th).
What the data marks out about this place comes first: modeled extreme heat resides in the top 0.10% nationally, and vision disability is in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled uninsured lands in the top 2.7% nationally, and self-care disability stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 2.1% nationally, fair or poor health settles in the top 2.2% nationally, and tooth loss sits in the top 2.9% nationally. Crowded housing lies in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled hearing disability rests in the top 1.8% nationally, and homeownership resides in the bottom 1.4% nationally.
Beside the areas that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 85356, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Yuma, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 66%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 42%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 4%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 15%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 6%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 58%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 27%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 27%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 30%
8%
Disability
healthier than 11%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 28%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 15%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 63%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 63%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.00%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 13%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 38%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85347
Arizonashares a border
Score 30.66
Closest healthier
85356
Arizonashares a border
Score 43.85
Similar health profile
87936
New Mexico97% similar profile
Score 30.74
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 33.5% | 30.4–36.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.6% | 41.1–48.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.8% | 8.8–10.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.2% | 9.9–12.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.9% | 10.6–13.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.5% | 11.4–15.7 |
| Depression among adults | 20.5% | 17.7–23.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 20.5% | 18.2–23.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.8% | 38.1–45.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 41.9% | 36.3–47.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.3% | 5.6–7.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 30.5% | 26.1–35.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 23.8% | 19.3–28.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.7% | 78.0–83.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 76.9% | 73.6–80.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.7% | 80.4–84.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 50.2% | 45.2–55.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 46.5% | 42.9–49.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 66.6% | 59.0–73.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.0% | 9.9–14.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.9% | 15.9–22.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 35.2% | 30.3–40.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.7% | 29.8–39.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 35.8% | 31.3–40.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.9% | 14.9–19.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 20.6% | 18.1–23.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.0% | 17.4–22.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.7% | 38.9–48.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 13.1% | 11.7–14.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.5% | 11.7–15.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 25.3% | 22.0–28.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 8.4% | 7.3–9.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 12.4% | 10.8–14.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.2% | 23.4–31.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 31.4% | 26.7–36.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 28.3% | 23.7–32.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 20.4% | 17.3–23.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 14.5% | 12.5–16.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.2% | 27.8–36.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.5% | 11.6–15.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 17.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 44.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 20.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 6.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 48.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 10.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 22.3% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 9.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 42.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 0.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 25.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $40,119 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | $763 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.8 yr ± 1.05 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured