Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85264

in Fort Mcdowell, ArizonaPopulation 1,261

35.55/ 100

Ranked #29,170 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.1%)

Ranked #334 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #153 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 3.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

341 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Park land

86.3%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

95.2 days/year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.77 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.0%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

19.3%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST26th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

11.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

11.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Fort Mcdowell, Arizona (ZIP 85264) lands in the bottom 9.1% nationally (29,170th) and the bottom 15% of Arizona (334th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: fatal road crashes lands in the top 0.01% nationally, and modeled extreme heat sits in the top 1.8% nationally. Walkability is in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and modeled vision disability settles in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled transportation resides in the top 2.6% nationally, modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 3.4% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 3.7% nationally. More encouragingly, park land lies in the top 0.4% nationally, and civic lands in the top 2.2% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, fatal road crashes runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 85215, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%25.2–29.4
High blood pressure among adults35.5%33.0–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%7.0–8.2
Current asthma among adults13.9%12.5–15.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.8–10.6
Depression among adults22.2%19.9–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.5–16.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%34.4–39.4
Obesity among adults37.3%33.4–41.4
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%16.4–21.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.9%12.0–18.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.1%68.5–73.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.6%69.9–75.2
Cholesterol screening among adults80.3%77.8–82.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.2%50.8–57.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.9%41.2–46.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.8%61.3–71.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%13.0–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.7%19.4–26.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%23.9–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%38.7–46.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%25.4–32.5
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.9–23.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.0%18.3–23.8
Any disability among adults41.4%37.4–45.2
Hearing disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.1
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.1–14.8
Mobility disability among adults19.6%17.3–22.0
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Vision disability among adults10.0%8.6–11.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.3%28.2–34.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.0%29.5–39.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults28.3%23.9–33.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.6%19.5–26.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.7–22.3
Loneliness among adults35.9%33.0–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.2–17.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6440.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)17.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)10.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle7.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)11.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households32.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+12.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age30.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$60,729$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$369,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$595$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.5 yr ± 1.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.93 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured