Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84652

in Redmond, UtahPopulation 840

53.74/ 100

Ranked #11,043 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #163 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

98.2 mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.3%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.5 days/year

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.2%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

17.5 mi

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

Redmond, Utah (ZIP 84652), by its overall standing, sits in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,043rd) and the bottom 43% of Utah (163rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally, housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss lies in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Homeownership sits in the top 15.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum, and distance to a community health center registers in the top 9.9% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 11.5% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 84620, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.03%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%25.8–32.5
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.0–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.8–8.2
Depression among adults27.9%24.2–32.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.3–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%31.6–39.4
Obesity among adults37.3%30.8–44.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.7–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.1–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.8%68.4–75.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%69.6–77.1
Cholesterol screening among adults81.7%79.3–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%63.1–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.8–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.7%63.6–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.3%9.2–13.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.0–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.4%17.5–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%29.8–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%15.8–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.7–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.0–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%13.8–18.5
Any disability among adults32.5%28.0–37.6
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.0–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.5–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.1–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%9.7–15.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.6–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.6–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–8.0
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.5–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6410.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate91.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households47.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+11.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age30.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$83,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$277,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured