Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

83803

in Bayview, IdahoPopulation 650

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

50.82/ 100

Ranked #15,109 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #131 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

69.4%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.4%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.6%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.3%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.5%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST32nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.1%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

18.4 mi

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST66th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Bayview, Idaho (ZIP 83803) places in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,109th) and the top 49% of Idaho (131st).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: park land sits in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Recreation rests in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Poverty is in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 5.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled fine-particle stands in the top 2.0% nationally, hearing disability registers in the top 3.5% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Walkability sits in the bottom 4.1% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 83860, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.4%33.1–39.6
High blood pressure among adults37.1%33.4–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.2–13.7
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.1–10.7
Depression among adults21.4%18.7–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.6–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%36.2–43.2
Obesity among adults31.7%27.2–36.1
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.8%15.6–22.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.1–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.0–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.6–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.2–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%58.8–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%58.5–64.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.5%59.9–72.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%11.2–15.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%9.7–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%17.8–25.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%29.8–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%15.7–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.1–15.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.7–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
Any disability among adults36.9%32.3–41.3
Hearing disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Independent living disability among adults8.1%6.8–9.4
Mobility disability among adults18.6%15.5–21.6
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.4–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.5%16.4–22.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.9–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.5–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.3–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–6.7
Loneliness among adults26.6%23.0–30.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle8.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate84.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households78.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+22.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age60.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$60,818$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$703,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 1.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.73 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured