Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79758

in Gardendale, TexasPopulation 2,016

54.13/ 100

Ranked #10,529 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #317 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 17%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Odessa, TX metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

52.6%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

64.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

82.3 days/year

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

60.1%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

93.4%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

2.3 mi

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Gardendale, Texas (ZIP 79758) places in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,529th) and the top 17% of Texas (317th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, and poverty rests in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled arsenic resides in the top 0.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands in the top 4.7% nationally, pfas stands in the top 7.9% nationally, and binge drinking registers in the top 8.3% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 11.0% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, arsenic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 79739, about 31 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Odessa, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.3%20.4–26.5
High blood pressure among adults31.7%27.7–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.0–6.5
Depression among adults22.7%19.3–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.4–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.3–39.9
Obesity among adults36.0%28.4–44.4
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.7–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.9%12.9–17.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.7%71.4–77.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.0%68.0–76.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.8–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%58.4–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.6%57.2–63.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%67.2–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.2–23.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%11.1–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%19.6–27.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%29.4–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%16.2–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.8–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
Any disability among adults28.3%24.4–32.4
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.6–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6416.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription76.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate93.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age35.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$102,560$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$390,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$2,536$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 2.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.22 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured