Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32224

in Jacksonville, FloridaPopulation 42,092

60.26/ 100

Ranked #4,661 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.6%)

Ranked #183 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #12 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

726 units

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

157.7 days/year

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.4%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.5%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.7%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 32224, one of several in Jacksonville, Florida sits in the top 14.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,661st) and the top 19% of Florida (183rd).

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 2.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and high cholesterol lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and energy burden settles in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and park land rests in the top 10.4% nationally. Against that, modeled humid heat settles in the top 2.9% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water lands at the national maximum.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 32081, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.7 ± 1.3 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.8 years — 3.9 years above them.

    Ranked #387 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.6%19.4–23.9
High blood pressure among adults28.4%25.5–31.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Depression among adults20.9%18.2–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.0%28.9–35.3
Obesity among adults28.5%24.3–33.0
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%7.1–10.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%9.1–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.2%69.5–74.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.8%71.7–77.9
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.6–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%66.0–74.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.2%59.1–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%73.3–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.9–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.6%17.8–23.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%33.6–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%13.2–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.0–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%12.2–15.1
Any disability among adults26.7%23.6–29.9
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Mobility disability among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate54.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population15.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age33.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$88,259$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$458,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,764$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured