Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78376

in Realitos, TexasPopulation 105

35.55/ 100

Ranked #29,173 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.1%)

Ranked #1,711 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 8.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

32.8%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

25.4%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37.3%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

99.4 days/year

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

31.8 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

37.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Realitos, Texas (ZIP 78376) ranks in the bottom 9.1% nationally (29,173rd) and the bottom 8.5% of Texas (1,711th).

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled uninsured sits in the top 0.7% nationally, and diabetes resides in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 1.5% nationally, self-care disability stands in the top 3.0% nationally, and extreme heat sits in the top 1.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides in the top 1.7% nationally, modeled hearing disability stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the top 1.9% nationally.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 78341, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%29.4–37.0
High blood pressure among adults48.2%43.5–52.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.9–10.7
Depression among adults17.5%14.7–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults25.4%22.3–28.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.6%41.8–51.6
Obesity among adults41.0%32.2–50.3
Stroke among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.0%16.2–24.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years32.8%27.5–38.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.3%81.9–86.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.7–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.1–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.7%50.3–62.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.2%40.2–48.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%62.7–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.0%8.9–13.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.3–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults45.2%39.4–51.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%30.7–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.3%32.9–41.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.7–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults20.4%17.9–23.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%14.8–19.3
Any disability among adults46.2%41.0–51.7
Hearing disability among adults12.8%11.3–14.3
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.4–13.7
Mobility disability among adults28.8%25.2–32.7
Self-care disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
Vision disability among adults12.9%11.3–14.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–648.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)28.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription59.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate90.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households72.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+34.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age59.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$40,714$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth89.1 yr ± 2.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.84 years of 89.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured