Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78204

in San Antonio, TexasPopulation 11,983

46.55/ 100

Ranked #20,700 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #806 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #76 of 117 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

27.7%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

5.2%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

97.8 days/year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

25.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

8.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.6 days/year

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

45.3%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.8%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 78204, one of several in San Antonio, Texas, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 35% nationally (20,700th) and the top 43% of Texas (806th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.6% nationally, loud transportation noise stands in the top 1.2% nationally, and extreme heat resides in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the top 1.6% nationally, humid heat stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and tree cover resides at the national minimum. Homeownership sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled vision disability stands in the top 8.3% nationally. On the better side, transit resides in the top 1.7% nationally, and walkability sits in the top 3.4% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 78205, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.0 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $60,255 predicts 78.1 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,836 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 18.5; chronic-disease standing 76.8 — 58 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,245 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%20.7–25.4
High blood pressure among adults35.5%32.4–38.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.0
Depression among adults21.1%18.5–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.2–19.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.2–38.4
Obesity among adults35.8%31.3–40.3
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.7–15.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years27.7%23.9–31.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.3%71.6–76.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.1%68.9–75.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%82.0–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.1%53.2–61.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.4%47.5–53.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%67.3–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.3–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.5–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%31.5–39.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.8%38.3–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.4%24.4–30.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%14.0–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.6–18.6
Any disability among adults35.3%31.6–39.0
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Mobility disability among adults17.5%15.5–19.6
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Vision disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6429.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)20.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)7.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle11.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate45.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population17.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households40.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$60,255$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$173,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,481$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured