Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77547

in Galena Park, TexasPopulation 9,217

38.03/ 100

Ranked #27,991 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.8%)

Ranked #1,602 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 14.3%)

Ranked #199 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

37.4%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

46.6%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.9%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

16.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.1%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

15.0%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

155.4 days/year

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

15.5%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

15.0%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Galena Park, Texas (ZIP 77547), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 12.8% nationally (27,991st) and the bottom 14.3% of Texas (1,602nd).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled uninsured lands in the top 0.4% nationally, colon screening resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 2.1% nationally, crowded housing stands in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled vision disability is in the top 4.7% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled humid heat sits in the top 3.2% nationally. Unemployment registers in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lands in the top 4.3% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 77015, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.8%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 0.8 (bottom 1%); chronic-disease standing 73.4 — 73 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,623 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.0 ± 3.7 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.9%16.9–21.0
High blood pressure among adults32.9%30.0–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Depression among adults19.1%16.7–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.0%14.3–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%33.1–39.5
Obesity among adults41.0%36.4–45.8
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.1%17.9–24.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years37.4%33.0–42.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.7%69.8–75.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.0%66.4–73.2
Cholesterol screening among adults79.8%77.3–82.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years46.6%42.7–50.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.8%36.9–42.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.9%56.5–70.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.2–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%12.2–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.6%31.7–40.0
Short sleep duration among adults42.5%38.9–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.8%26.7–33.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.7–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.2–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.7–22.1
Any disability among adults38.2%34.6–42.3
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.2–11.5
Mobility disability among adults17.6%15.7–19.9
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.3–6.5
Vision disability among adults10.1%9.2–11.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6443.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)35.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)15.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate70.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)16.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population32.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households44.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+11.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$50,991$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$111,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,157$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.90 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured