Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77484

in Waller, TexasPopulation 14,348

49.72/ 100

Ranked #16,624 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #555 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #106 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

18.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

149.1 days/year

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

61 days/year

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

258 units

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Waller, Texas (ZIP 77484) lands in the bottom 48% nationally (16,624th) and the top 30% of Texas (555th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 9.6% nationally, and modeled radon lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled pfas resides in the bottom 17% nationally. On the other hand, modeled uninsured lands in the top 6.0% nationally, humid heat registers in the top 5.0% nationally, and extreme heat sits in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 10.3% nationally, crowded housing is in the top 13.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 14.9% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 16% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 77355, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.4%22.1–27.0
High blood pressure among adults35.4%32.2–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.6–7.8
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.9–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.2–7.6
Depression among adults21.8%19.2–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.9–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.0–40.9
Obesity among adults37.5%31.4–44.2
Stroke among adults3.5%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%11.7–15.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.4%16.6–20.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%73.7–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%71.4–77.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.8–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%56.8–64.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.5%53.7–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%66.5–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.6–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%24.0–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%32.1–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%20.1–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.6–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.7–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%14.1–17.1
Any disability among adults32.7%29.5–36.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.6–16.9
Self-care disability among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6423.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)16.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate73.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population14.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households65.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age35.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$81,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$284,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,103$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured