Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77367

in Riverside, TexasPopulation 446

37.85/ 100

Ranked #28,105 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.4%)

Ranked #1,611 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 13.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

12.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

17.4%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.3%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.5%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

146.5 days/year

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Riverside, Texas (ZIP 77367) stands in the bottom 12.4% nationally (28,105th) and the bottom 13.8% of Texas (1,611th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 1.5% nationally, and hearing disability stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Crowded housing sits in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled stroke resides in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 4.3% nationally, high blood pressure sits in the top 3.9% nationally, and diabetes resides in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat stands in the top 5.6% nationally, and high cholesterol sits in the top 3.8% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally.

For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 75862, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.2%34.2–42.3
High blood pressure among adults49.5%44.8–54.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.7%11.4–14.0
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults12.2%10.6–14.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.3%10.2–14.8
Depression among adults23.0%19.6–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.1%16.5–21.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.3%40.6–50.2
Obesity among adults38.6%30.4–47.7
Stroke among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.2–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%11.8–17.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.3%81.8–86.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%77.7–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.7–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%59.2–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.7%50.1–57.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%63.5–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%9.9–14.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.2–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.6%28.0–39.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%30.8–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.7%23.6–32.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.7–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%15.7–20.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%13.7–18.3
Any disability among adults42.1%36.8–47.6
Hearing disability among adults12.9%11.3–14.7
Independent living disability among adults11.6%9.9–13.6
Mobility disability among adults24.4%20.9–28.4
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.3–7.3
Vision disability among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)13.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)11.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate48.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)17.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households35.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+8.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age35.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$936$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 3.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.27 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured