Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77085

in Houston, TexasPopulation 16,513

41.75/ 100

Ranked #25,434 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #1,320 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #178 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

33.1%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51.8%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.9 days/year

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

7.8%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.3%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.9%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 77085, one of several in Houston, Texas, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 21% nationally (25,434th) and the bottom 29% of Texas (1,320th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled uninsured lands in the top 0.7% nationally, colon screening is in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and vision disability resides in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 2.0% nationally, humid heat lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 4.5% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 4.9% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum. Slow internet speeds stands in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health lands in the top 6.8% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 77035, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.6 ± 1.8 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.6%18.5–22.8
High blood pressure among adults36.6%33.7–39.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Depression among adults19.1%16.8–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%15.5–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%33.0–39.3
Obesity among adults42.6%38.2–47.1
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.4%16.5–22.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years33.1%29.1–37.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%72.0–77.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.4%69.1–75.4
Cholesterol screening among adults80.8%78.6–82.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.8%47.9–55.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.6%41.6–47.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%64.9–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.9–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.7–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.0%32.0–40.0
Short sleep duration among adults43.2%39.6–46.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.9%27.8–34.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.5–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.4–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%18.1–22.4
Any disability among adults38.9%35.1–42.7
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Mobility disability among adults19.3%17.3–21.4
Self-care disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Vision disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6436.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)36.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate68.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population33.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households44.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+15.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$68,470$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$191,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,338$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured