Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77045

in Houston, TexasPopulation 33,563

41.18/ 100

Ranked #25,897 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #1,356 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #182 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

29.2%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.3%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

907 units

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

53.9%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST14th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

12.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.2 days/year

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.6 mi

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 77045, one of several in Houston, Texas sits in the bottom 19% nationally (25,897th) and the bottom 27% of Texas (1,356th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.3% nationally, industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 1.5% nationally, and vision disability lands in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening resides in the bottom 4.0% nationally, modeled short sleep lies in the top 3.7% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled humid heat stands in the top 4.1% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 5.8% nationally. More positively, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 1.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 77025, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.3 ± 1.6 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.0%19.8–24.3
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.9–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Depression among adults18.8%16.4–21.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%16.0–19.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.3–39.7
Obesity among adults43.3%38.6–48.0
Stroke among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%17.4–23.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years29.2%26.4–32.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%74.0–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%71.4–77.2
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.6–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.9%49.9–57.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.6%41.6–47.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%65.0–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%13.4–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%30.7–38.5
Short sleep duration among adults44.5%40.8–48.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.6%26.8–32.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.1–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%14.0–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%17.1–21.0
Any disability among adults38.3%34.8–42.0
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.2–12.5
Mobility disability among adults19.7%17.6–21.8
Self-care disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Vision disability among adults10.3%9.4–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6436.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)25.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)10.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription93.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate61.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population22.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households30.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+13.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$59,688$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$181,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,291$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured