Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77071

in Houston, TexasPopulation 27,056

48.34/ 100

Ranked #18,492 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #653 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #115 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

31.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

20.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

154.5 days/year

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.5%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 77071, one of several in Houston, Texas, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 42% nationally (18,492nd) and the top 35% of Texas (653rd).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled uninsured lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 3.5% nationally, air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and short sleep rests in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 8.9% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 9.4% nationally. On the stronger side, walkability rests in the top 7.9% nationally, and modeled radon settles in the bottom 1.0% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 77096, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.9 ± 1.6 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.7%20.4–25.1
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.8–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Depression among adults18.4%16.0–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.3%14.5–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.0–40.5
Obesity among adults39.6%35.2–44.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%13.3–18.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.1%17.9–22.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.7–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%73.8–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.6–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.5%55.5–63.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.0%48.0–53.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%67.4–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.2–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.2%11.5–15.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%25.4–32.5
Short sleep duration among adults42.5%38.9–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%21.5–26.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.2–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.2–17.6
Any disability among adults33.5%30.2–37.0
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Mobility disability among adults17.0%15.1–19.0
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6424.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)16.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)8.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle11.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate51.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population29.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households46.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+16.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$54,139$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$245,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,100$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured