Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76666

in Mertens, TexasPopulation 261

46.65/ 100

Ranked #20,585 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #791 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

89 days/year

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

18.6 mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.8%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Mertens, Texas (ZIP 76666) ranks in the bottom 36% nationally (20,585th) and the top 42% of Texas (791st).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: households without a vehicle settles at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled radon resides in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled extreme heat rests in the top 3.3% nationally, PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, and distance to an emergency room lies in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled humid heat lands in the top 12.0% nationally, modeled uninsured sits in the top 9.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 13.1% nationally. Homeownership settles in the bottom 13.5% nationally.

To spell things out, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 76041, about 7.2 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.4–29.5
High blood pressure among adults36.0%32.0–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.0–8.0
Depression among adults22.7%19.5–26.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.8–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%33.1–41.4
Obesity among adults34.6%27.2–42.4
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.9%12.2–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.8%13.4–18.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.5–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.0%71.2–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.7–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%56.2–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.4%51.8–59.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.8%62.9–77.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.2–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.7–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.1–32.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%33.4–46.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%18.3–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.3–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.3–17.1
Any disability among adults33.6%29.5–38.2
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.1
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.2–17.4
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription83.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate57.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population6.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+10.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age30.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$93,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured