Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76120

in Fort Worth, TexasPopulation 21,102

51.19/ 100

Ranked #14,551 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #452 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #132 of 265 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

93.3 days/year

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.8%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.2%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

324 units

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

89.3%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

89.3%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.7%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

40.5%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 76120, one of several in Fort Worth, Texas comes out in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,551st) and the top 24% of Texas (452nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally, high cholesterol registers in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 7.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled extreme heat is in the top 2.0% nationally, and short sleep resides in the top 4.9% nationally. PFOA in drinking water rests in the top 8.9% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water lies in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 9.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the top 9.5% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 76012, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 32.8; chronic-disease standing 86.7 — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,792 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.9%17.8–22.0
High blood pressure among adults31.8%28.9–34.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.2–5.1
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.9%4.3–5.4
Depression among adults22.5%19.8–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.1%27.2–33.1
Obesity among adults35.8%31.4–40.2
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.3%11.9–17.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.1%13.3–17.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.4%68.3–74.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.5%70.4–76.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.2–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.7%55.9–63.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.0%52.1–58.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%73.8–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.7–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%11.1–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%24.3–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.8%40.1–47.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%18.4–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.8–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.6–16.9
Any disability among adults29.2%26.0–32.5
Hearing disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.8
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Mobility disability among adults13.0%11.5–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6417.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate52.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population16.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households43.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+7.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age32.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$80,922$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$306,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,395$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured