Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76012

in Arlington, TexasPopulation 27,991

51.89/ 100

Ranked #13,600 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #428 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #125 of 265 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

93.1 days/year

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

35.9 per million

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.4%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Park land

7.7%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

78.6%

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 76012, one of several in Arlington, Texas, by its composite score, sits in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,600th) and the top 23% of Texas (428th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: physicians rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and dental providers resides in the top 3.4% nationally. Walkability is in the top 10.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, PFOS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, modeled extreme heat registers in the top 2.1% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water settles at the national maximum. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 8.7% nationally, uninsured lies in the top 8.4% nationally, and disaster risk rests in the top 10.4% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 76016, about 1.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.1 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $88,141 predicts 79.6 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,373 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.7–27.7
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.2–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.0
Depression among adults22.6%19.9–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.9–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.5–38.9
Obesity among adults32.5%28.3–36.9
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.4–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.4%14.6–18.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.9%73.0–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.8%71.7–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.8–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%60.6–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.6%55.9–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%73.3–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.3–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%24.4–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%34.8–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%18.8–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.8–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.9–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.9–15.8
Any disability among adults31.3%28.2–34.6
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.3–16.8
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6430.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription93.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate67.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population20.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households48.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$88,141$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$334,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,442$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured