ZIP code

75422

in Campbell, TexasPopulation 3,229

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

46.60/ 100

Ranked #20,636 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #798 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #179 of 265 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

49.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd

US96th

Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

78.8 days/year

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th

US95th

Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th

US6th

Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Campbell, Texas (ZIP 75422) lands in the bottom 36% nationally (20,636th) and the top 43% of Texas (798th).

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled radon sits in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, fatal road crashes lies in the top 4.0% nationally, and modeled extreme heat stands in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 12.3% nationally, and loud transportation noise registers in the top 12.9% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. PFOS in drinking water is in the top 18% nationally.

Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. On the overall standing, ZIP 75402, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesTexasMetro area

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of the United States

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 44%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of Texas

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

About typical

close to the middle of Texas

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Disability

healthier than 54%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of Texas

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of this metro area

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

close to the middle of this metro area

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of this metro area

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

Disability

healthier than 31%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	28.4%	25.0–31.7
High blood pressure among adults	38.0%	33.6–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	9.2%	8.2–10.2
Current asthma among adults	10.5%	9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults	7.4%	6.4–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	8.3%	7.0–9.7
Depression among adults	23.7%	20.1–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	12.8%	11.0–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	39.5%	34.9–43.9
Obesity among adults	35.4%	27.4–43.5
Stroke among adults	3.9%	3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	17.5%	14.2–20.8

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	13.6%	11.1–16.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	78.3%	75.1–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	75.5%	71.6–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults	86.4%	84.4–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	60.3%	54.9–65.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	57.3%	53.4–61.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	69.7%	61.2–77.2

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	16.7%	13.6–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults	15.3%	12.7–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	27.3%	22.3–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults	35.9%	29.3–42.5

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	22.1%	18.8–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults	17.8%	15.7–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults	15.0%	13.0–17.1

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	15.6%	13.5–17.8
Any disability among adults	34.1%	29.3–38.9
Hearing disability among adults	8.1%	7.1–9.1
Independent living disability among adults	8.9%	7.7–10.2
Mobility disability among adults	16.2%	13.7–18.8
Self-care disability among adults	4.1%	3.6–4.7
Vision disability among adults	5.3%	4.6–6.0

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	14.4%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	12.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–64	15.6%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	22.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)	20.1%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	12.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	24.2%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	21.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)	6.8%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	4.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle	0.0%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	3.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription	84.3%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	89.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	15.7%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	26.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate	81.4%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	75.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	2.7%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	3.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population	2.3%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	8.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households	55.2%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	48.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+	17.0%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	16.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age	43.4 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	38.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income	$75,690	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value	$229,400	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent	$1,166	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth	75.1 yr ± 1.50	78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308	78.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.50 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

75750Texas98% similar
Score 46.13View 75750 Compare this ZIP with 75750
76901Texas97% similar
Score 45.94View 76901 Compare this ZIP with 76901
76801Texas97% similar
Score 42.69View 76801 Compare this ZIP with 76801
76640Texas97% similar
Score 45.51View 76640 Compare this ZIP with 76640
75474Texas97% similar
Score 43.27View 75474 Compare this ZIP with 75474
75496Texas97% similar
Score 45.48View 75496 Compare this ZIP with 75496
76424Texas97% similar
Score 42.27View 76424 Compare this ZIP with 76424
32506Florida97% similar
Score 45.44View 32506 Compare this ZIP with 32506
75442Texas97% similar
Score 46.10View 75442 Compare this ZIP with 75442
75643Texas96% similar
Score 44.41View 75643 Compare this ZIP with 75643

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured