ZIP code
75132
in Fate, TexasPopulation 0
56.13/ 100
Ranked #8,133 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)
Ranked #249 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 13.4%)
Ranked #82 of 265 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ZIPs (top 31%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
87.3 days/year
in the top 3.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST62ndUS96thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Walkability
170 intersections/sq mi
in the top 4.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
12.9%
in the top 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 13.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS14thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Mammography
77.3%
in the top 32% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS68thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
Fate, Texas (ZIP 75132) ranks in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,133rd) and the top 13.4% of Texas (249th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and walkability resides in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 12.1% nationally, and expected annual loss sits in the bottom 13.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled extreme heat resides in the top 3.7% nationally, tree cover stands at the national minimum, and transportation noise sits in the top 5.7% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 13.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat sits in the top 14.4% nationally.
Against its neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 75087, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 82%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 93%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 67%
11%
Disability
healthier than 71%
7%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 53%
8%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 33%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 37%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 15%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 74%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 95%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 83%
11%
Disability
healthier than 78%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 81%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 55%
8%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 20%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 23%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 94%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 75%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 86%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 52%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 59%
8%
Disability
healthier than 59%
7%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 26%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 10%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
75087
Texasshares a border
Score 60.84
Closest healthier
75032
Texasabout 1.3 mi away
Score 59.25
Similar health profile
78701
Texas97% similar profile
Score 66.59
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 21.5% | 18.6–24.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.0% | 27.9–36.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.3% | 5.6–7.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 9.5–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.2% | 4.4–6.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.4% | 4.2–6.8 |
| Depression among adults | 22.2% | 18.7–25.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.1% | 9.4–13.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.3% | 30.0–38.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.1% | 28.2–44.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.0% | 2.5–3.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.4% | 6.7–10.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.2% | 10.9–18.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.5% | 71.4–77.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.4% | 70.3–78.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.6% | 84.0–88.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 68.3% | 63.3–73.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.8% | 61.4–68.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.3% | 69.7–83.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.5% | 13.5–19.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.2% | 8.4–14.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.3% | 18.6–28.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.6% | 30.2–43.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.7% | 15.3–22.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.1% | 14.6–19.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.4% | 10.4–14.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.5% | 12.0–17.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 29.5% | 24.7–35.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.8% | 4.9–6.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.5% | 6.1–9.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.4% | 10.1–15.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.8% | 4.1–5.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TX median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 22.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | — | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | — | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 26.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 75.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868 |
| Foreign-born population | — | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861 |
| Population 65+ | — | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 16.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 38.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TX median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.4 yr ± 1.52 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.52 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured