Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76051

in Grapevine, TexasPopulation 50,618

58.79/ 100

Ranked #5,757 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #172 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #58 of 265 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

91.2 days/year

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.5%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.1%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.7%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.5%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

84%

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Grapevine, Texas (ZIP 76051) comes out in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,757th) and the top 9.3% of Texas (172nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: physicians sits in the top 3.7% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and modeled hearing disability registers in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure stands in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and stroke lands in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Set against that, modeled disaster risk is in the top 2.1% nationally, and extreme heat resides in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 4.5% nationally, and expected annual loss lies in the top 8.6% nationally. Homeownership sits in the bottom 10.4% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 75019, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 80.0 ± 1.2 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.4%19.2–23.8
High blood pressure among adults28.7%25.8–31.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%4.1–5.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Depression among adults23.3%20.5–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%30.2–36.5
Obesity among adults29.3%25.3–33.6
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.8–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.9–12.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.8%69.6–75.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.2%70.0–76.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.8–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%60.8–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%61.7–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%73.4–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.6–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%18.3–23.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%32.9–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Any disability among adults24.9%22.1–27.9
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.4–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6415.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)4.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription95.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate52.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population16.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$111,160$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$489,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,862$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured