Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74731

in Cartwright, OklahomaPopulation 1,646

32.33/ 100

Ranked #30,222 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.8%)

Ranked #542 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 14.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

13.0%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.2%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST20th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

60.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.3%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.5 µg/L

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.7%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.4%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

74.4 days/year

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

73.9 mi

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cartwright, Oklahoma (ZIP 74731) lands in the bottom 5.8% nationally (30,222nd) and the bottom 14.6% of Oklahoma (542nd).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled hearing disability is in the top 2.0% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled mobility disability registers in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 3.9% nationally, high cholesterol stands in the top 3.2% nationally, and extreme heat lies in the top 5.5% nationally. More encouragingly, lithium in drinking water lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the top 5.9% nationally.

A note on the terms: lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 73439, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.06%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 66.7; chronic-disease standing 5.1 (bottom 10%) — 62 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,615 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.2%32.5–39.9
High blood pressure among adults47.7%43.3–51.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.1–11.2
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.9–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.9%11.1–14.9
Depression among adults26.6%22.8–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%14.9–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.7%41.2–50.2
Obesity among adults41.5%34.3–48.8
Stroke among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%15.0–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%9.9–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%78.9–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.0–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.4–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%57.0–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.3%51.5–59.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.2%56.5–73.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.4%9.3–13.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.5%18.2–25.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.0%33.4–44.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%31.8–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.0%24.2–32.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.0–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults18.8%16.4–21.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%16.9–22.1
Any disability among adults45.2%40.0–50.4
Hearing disability among adults13.0%11.5–14.5
Independent living disability among adults12.2%10.7–14.0
Mobility disability among adults24.3%21.1–27.6
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%21.0–29.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%17.9–25.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.6%16.0–23.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.9–16.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.0–12.1
Loneliness among adults31.1%26.0–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.4–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6441.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)29.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle7.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription80.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate75.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households51.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age51.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$54,286$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$158,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$1,050$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 1.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.69 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured