Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74452

in Peggs, OklahomaPopulation 279

37.38/ 100

Ranked #28,358 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranked #417 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

51.2%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.3%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST21st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

61.5%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

79.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.82%

in the top 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.0%

in the top 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

29.7 days/year

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Peggs, Oklahoma (ZIP 74452) sits in the bottom 11.6% nationally (28,358th) and the bottom 34% of Oklahoma (417th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled colon screening is in the bottom 2.5% nationally, modeled mammography rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Modeled obesity registers in the top 4.9% nationally, utility shutoff lands in the top 10.6% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the top 11.6% nationally. More positively, modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and tree cover settles in the top 5.0% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 74464, about 0.7 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%27.8–33.4
High blood pressure among adults43.4%40.0–47.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults12.5%11.3–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.4–10.7
Depression among adults24.5%21.7–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.7–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%36.1–43.3
Obesity among adults44.7%39.0–51.0
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.3%17.5–23.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.4%8.7–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.4–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%75.2–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%82.1–85.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.2%47.1–55.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.5%49.6–55.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.3%58.5–71.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.5–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.1%20.3–26.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.1%29.9–38.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.8%35.8–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.4%22.6–28.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.5–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.5–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.4–21.8
Any disability among adults42.9%38.7–47.3
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Mobility disability among adults20.0%17.8–22.4
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%24.2–30.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%19.8–26.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.9%16.1–22.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.7–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.7–13.6
Loneliness among adults32.5%28.8–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.6–14.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6438.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)15.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription61.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate79.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population4.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households35.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age51.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$57,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$216,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$367$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured