Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

73756

in Loyal, OklahomaPopulation 292

45.26/ 100

Ranked #22,127 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #138 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

65.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

72.3 days/year

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.2 mi

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.13%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

8.3%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Loyal, Oklahoma (ZIP 73756), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 31% nationally (22,127th) and the top 22% of Oklahoma (138th).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled nitrate registers in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled extreme heat stands in the top 5.7% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 7.5% nationally. Lead in tap water is in the top 11.0% nationally, poverty resides in the top 12.5% nationally, and modeled mammography rests in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. More positively, modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 12.3% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 73744, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.2%27.6–35.0
High blood pressure among adults40.2%35.8–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.9–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.2–10.3
Depression among adults24.7%21.1–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.4–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%36.8–45.8
Obesity among adults37.3%29.8–45.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.3–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%7.5–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.2–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%74.8–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.4–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%63.2–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.4%58.7–66.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.6%60.8–77.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.1–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%13.5–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.8%27.3–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%29.3–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%16.6–23.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%14.8–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.5–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%13.8–18.8
Any disability among adults36.1%31.1–41.6
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.5
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.3–10.3
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.1–19.9
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%19.8–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.0–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%8.9–14.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.9–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.6
Loneliness among adults31.1%26.0–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6427.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)11.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription88.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate73.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population10.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households58.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+23.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age40.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$62,596$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$152,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$875$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.1 yr ± 2.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.11 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured