ZIP code
73096
in Weatherford, OklahomaPopulation 14,364
46.90/ 100
Ranked #20,283 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)
Ranked #109 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 17%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the top 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Nitrate in drinking water
4.3%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST64thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Mammography
67.4%
in the bottom 6.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST47thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
66.9 days/year
in the top 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
31.6%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
48.8%
in the bottom 8.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST5thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.1%
in the top 10.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
93.4%
in the top 12.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS88thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Weatherford, Oklahoma (ZIP 73096) places in the bottom 37% nationally (20,283rd) and the top 17% of Oklahoma (109th).
The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Fiber broadband resides in the top 12.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled disaster risk is in the top 3.3% nationally, nitrate lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 6.3% nationally, modeled extreme heat settles in the top 6.3% nationally, and homeownership sits in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Slow internet speeds lies in the top 10.4% nationally.
Beside the areas that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 73724, about 19 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 77%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 33%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 35%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 10%
8%
Disability
healthier than 39%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 26%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 35%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 93%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 65%
11%
Disability
healthier than 80%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 86%
5%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 40%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 13%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 8%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
73021
Oklahomashares a border
Score 43.70
Closest healthier
73724
Oklahomaabout 19 mi away
Score 47.01
Similar health profile
77840
Texas97% similar profile
Score 43.52
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 22.7% | 20.5–25.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 31.5% | 28.4–34.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.5% | 6.0–7.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.5% | 10.3–12.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.7% | 5.2–6.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.6% | 5.9–7.5 |
| Depression among adults | 27.7% | 24.3–31.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.7% | 8.6–10.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 31.6% | 28.4–35.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.8% | 33.3–46.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.9% | 2.6–3.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 13.7% | 11.3–16.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.8% | 9.2–13.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 70.4% | 68.2–72.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.9% | 71.4–78.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 78.5% | 75.9–80.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.5% | 57.3–67.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 57.5% | 53.7–61.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.4% | 58.7–75.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.0% | 13.4–18.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.4% | 12.5–16.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 29.1% | 25.2–33.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.5% | 32.0–45.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.5% | 17.2–22.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.9% | 17.9–22.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.8% | 11.5–14.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.2% | 17.2–21.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.0% | 34.8–43.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.8% | 7.1–8.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.9–11.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 13.5% | 12.0–15.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.3–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.8% | 5.2–6.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.4% | 19.9–27.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.2% | 16.2–22.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 16.2% | 13.7–19.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.0% | 11.9–16.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.0% | 9.5–12.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.9% | 29.7–40.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 9.0–12.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 17.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 14.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 41.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 92.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 32.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 48.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.6% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.3% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 36.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 13.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 28.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $59,138 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $248,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $808 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.0 yr ± 0.91 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured