Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

73090

in Union City, OklahomaPopulation 927

43.50/ 100

Ranked #23,901 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #189 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #63 of 105 Oklahoma City, OK ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

4.1%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

5.6%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

46.2%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

65 days/year

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.9%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST53rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST19th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.6%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

17.4%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US74th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Union City, Oklahoma (ZIP 73090), overall, ranks in the bottom 25% nationally (23,901st) and the top 30% of Oklahoma (189th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: home broadband subscription sits in the top 7.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled nitrate lies in the top 4.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 4.7% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled extreme heat registers in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and colon screening settles in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise is in the top 9.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 73059, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Oklahoma City, OK metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.6–30.4
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.3–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.2–8.6
Depression among adults24.6%21.5–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.4–41.7
Obesity among adults40.7%35.5–46.1
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.1–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.0–12.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.3–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%73.6–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.1%81.6–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.6%52.9–61.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.5%58.0–64.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.9%60.0–74.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.6–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.1–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%24.9–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%32.3–42.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.6–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.9–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.1–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.2–18.9
Any disability among adults35.9%31.7–40.5
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.6
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.1–17.6
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%21.2–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.3–18.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.1–14.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.9–14.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Loneliness among adults32.7%28.0–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.2–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6410.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)10.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription97.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate88.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households55.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+10.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$96,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$181,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$1,268$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured