Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72801

in Russellville, ArkansasPopulation 19,019

39.73/ 100

Ranked #26,928 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #267 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Cognitive disability

23.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

45.9%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.4%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 72801, one of several in Russellville, Arkansas places in the bottom 16% nationally (26,928th) and the top 48% of Arkansas (267th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 2.2% nationally, and homeownership rests in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 8.3% nationally. On the stronger side, mental-health providers is in the top 2.5% nationally, physicians lands in the top 4.1% nationally, and outpatient stands in the top 4.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Dental providers settles in the top 5.7% nationally, childcare sits in the top 6.1% nationally, and walkability lies in the top 8.2% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 72802, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%21.9–27.2
High blood pressure among adults33.8%30.3–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.9–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Depression among adults26.3%22.8–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.4–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%30.2–37.3
Obesity among adults43.6%37.0–50.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.4%17.7–24.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.4%12.4–16.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.2%67.7–72.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%70.2–78.0
Cholesterol screening among adults76.7%73.8–79.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.4%57.1–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.7%45.7–53.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.8%62.2–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.7–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.6–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%29.8–39.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%32.1–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.3%23.2–29.3
Frequent mental distress among adults22.4%19.8–24.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.6–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.2%20.6–25.7
Any disability among adults41.9%37.3–46.3
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults12.4%11.0–13.8
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%23.7–31.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.3%21.0–27.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.5–18.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.7–19.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.8–15.3
Loneliness among adults36.2%31.3–41.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6412.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)18.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle9.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription84.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate45.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population9.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households35.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+12.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age27.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$47,830$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$163,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$839$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured