Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72758

in Rogers, ArkansasPopulation 48,233

55.52/ 100

Ranked #8,839 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #20 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 3.6%)

Ranked #9 of 40 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.8%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.6%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.2%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

4.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.2%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 72758, one of several in Rogers, Arkansas ranks in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,839th) and the top 3.6% of Arkansas (20th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Dental providers is in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled stroke lies in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 12.1% nationally. On the other hand, modeled disaster risk lands in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 13.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 72712, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.6 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $99,147 predicts 80.0 years — 1.4 years below.

    Ranked #1,775 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 33.0; chronic-disease standing 87.3 — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,834 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.4%19.2–23.7
High blood pressure among adults31.4%28.5–34.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.4–7.7
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Depression among adults23.5%20.6–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.8%28.6–35.1
Obesity among adults35.6%31.0–40.6
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.7–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.6–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.2%71.2–77.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.4–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%82.9–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.2%54.5–63.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%55.6–62.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%65.3–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.1–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.9–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%23.2–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%30.6–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.7–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%11.2–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.9–17.2
Any disability among adults30.2%27.0–33.6
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%22.4–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.2–14.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.7–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6412.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)13.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate58.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population14.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households44.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+11.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age33.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$99,147$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$407,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$1,378$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured