Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71646

in Hamburg, ArkansasPopulation 6,563

28.90/ 100

Ranked #30,967 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.5%)

Ranked #530 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 5.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

29.1%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.6%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.4%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.9%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.3%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.5%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Hamburg, Arkansas (ZIP 71646) sits in the bottom 3.5% nationally (30,967th) and the bottom 5.7% of Arkansas (530th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled tooth loss lands in the top 3.7% nationally, cognitive disability rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 4.3% nationally, mammography rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and mobility disability settles in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled self-care disability lands in the top 6.3% nationally, and vision disability rests in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep settles in the top 5.5% nationally. Better still, elder services lands in the top 4.2% nationally.

A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 71635, just across the boundary. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 4.3% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.1 ± 2.3 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.6 years — 3.5 years above them.

    Ranked #539 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.4; chronic-disease standing 5.9 (bottom 10%) — 84 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #339 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.2–38.3
High blood pressure among adults47.9%43.6–52.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%9.1–11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.7%11.4–14.1
Depression among adults27.0%23.3–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%15.8–20.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%37.7–46.5
Obesity among adults45.7%38.2–53.6
Stroke among adults5.5%5.1–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.1%24.5–34.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.2%13.2–17.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.5–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.5–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.2–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.6%51.0–62.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.7%39.9–47.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.0%56.3–74.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.6–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.2%19.6–25.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.5%38.4–48.7
Short sleep duration among adults43.5%36.4–50.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.4%30.1–36.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.9%18.6–23.2
Frequent physical distress among adults20.2%18.1–22.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.6%20.3–25.0
Any disability among adults47.4%42.8–52.1
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.6–11.9
Independent living disability among adults13.9%12.5–15.3
Mobility disability among adults24.4%21.9–27.1
Self-care disability among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Vision disability among adults9.3%8.5–10.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.8%24.8–33.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.1%23.7–30.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.2–22.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.0%16.6–21.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
Loneliness among adults37.0%31.7–42.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.8–16.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6414.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)16.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription79.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate74.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+15.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$40,823$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$89,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$642$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured