ZIP code
28454
in Maple Hill, North CarolinaPopulation 2,895
49.10/ 100
Ranked #17,513 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)
Ranked #432 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 46%)
Ranked #10 of 11 Jacksonville, NC ZIPs (bottom 9.1%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
1.0%
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Lead in tap water
0 ppb
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
US1stDefinition & source ›
The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›Radon
0.6 pCi/L
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.
Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.
Full methodology ›Walkability
2.3 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 9.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST7thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
8.2 mi
in the top 16% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS84thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
20 per million
in the bottom 25% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS25thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›The read
Maple Hill, North Carolina (ZIP 28454), overall, ranks in the bottom 45% nationally (17,513th) and the bottom 46% of North Carolina (432nd).
Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 2.5% nationally, lead in tap water lands at the national minimum, and modeled radon lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Pharmacy rests in the top 12.8% nationally, and modeled mammography registers in the top 11.7% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Unemployment settles in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other side, walkability is in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits in the top 16% nationally.
Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 28443, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, NC metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 67%
13%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 43%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 45%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 49%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 50%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 47%
5%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 37%
8%
Disability
healthier than 35%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 24%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 57%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 42%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 58%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 51%
8%
Disability
healthier than 49%
7%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 31%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 19%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 70%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 40%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 50%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 40%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 40%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
28425
North Carolinashares a border
Score 48.96
Closest healthier
28443
North Carolinashares a border
Score 60.13
Similar health profile
71106
Louisiana95% similar profile
Score 45.10
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.1% | 26.6–31.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 40.2% | 37.2–43.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.7% | 7.0–8.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 10.2–12.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.3% | 6.7–8.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.2% | 7.4–9.2 |
| Depression among adults | 23.7% | 20.9–26.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.9% | 12.5–15.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.9% | 31.7–38.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.4% | 33.1–44.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 4.1–4.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 17.2% | 14.7–20.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.9% | 9.4–12.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.2% | 76.1–80.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.1% | 78.4–83.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.8% | 85.2–88.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 68.9% | 64.9–72.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 59.2% | 56.1–62.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.9% | 74.4–84.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.1% | 12.0–16.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.9% | 14.0–18.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.6% | 22.4–29.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.8% | 33.9–44.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 21.5% | 19.4–24.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.9% | 16.3–19.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.9% | 12.6–15.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.6% | 15.0–18.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.7% | 32.4–39.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.9–8.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.7–10.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.7% | 15.1–18.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.8% | 4.4–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.8–6.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.3% | 21.2–27.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.2% | 15.9–20.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 16.0% | 13.9–18.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.3% | 12.6–16.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.8% | 8.8–11.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.2% | 29.9–38.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 8.8–11.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 7.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 13.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 11.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 25.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 22.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793 |
| Broadband subscription | 82.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 25.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 24.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793 |
| Homeownership rate | 82.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 75.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799 |
| Single-parent households | 51.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790 |
| Population 65+ | 13.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799 |
| Median age | 32.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797 |
| Median household income | $73,015 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749 |
| Median home value | $209,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758 |
| Median gross rent | $1,558 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $957 ($715–$1,575) n=687 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.0 yr ± 1.17 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured